Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1072MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +221%
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1152
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GK104
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy