Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +1660%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
480
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
AD107
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy