Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

ATI FirePro V4900 vs NVIDIA NVS 510

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900 +150%
0.768 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Oct 2012
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
480
Shading Units
192
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
GK107
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy