Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 86W)
AMD Radeon HD 6750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6750 +31%
1.008 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
9
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
720
24
TMUs
36
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1008 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
86W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Juniper
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Juniper LE (215-0754009)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy