Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +899%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2020
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 10
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy