Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG +1500%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2017
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
64
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Vega 10
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
260W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy