Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1312 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +1487%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 33
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 33
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy