Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
3616 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +966%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Fiji
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy