Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

ATI FirePro V4900 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +576%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2011
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
1408
24
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Turks
GPU Name
Navi 14
Turks XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy