Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

ATI FirePro V5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1188MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 +307%
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
-
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

56W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GM206
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy