Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +634%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Sep 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1792
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

56W
TDP
190W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Tonga
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
5 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy