Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X +816%
4.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
-
-
-
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

56W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Tonga
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
5 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy