Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

ATI FirePro V5700 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +1728%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
22.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
448.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

56W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
Fiji
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy