Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD FirePro V5900

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800 +79%
1.104 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2011
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
8
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Cayman
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

74W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy