Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

ATI FirePro V5800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
560 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (74W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800 +85%
1.104 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
GT200B
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

74W
TDP
289W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy