Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

ATI FirePro V5800 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 290W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X +410%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2013
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
2816
40
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
27.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1104 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

74W
TDP
290W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Juniper
GPU Name
Hawaii
Juniper XT GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.04 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
166 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy