Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD FirePro S9150

AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +725%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
44
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Hawaii
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy