Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD FirePro V5900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 +197%
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GM206
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
90W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy