Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD FirePro V5900 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V5900 +23%
0.614 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
4
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV670
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy