Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro V5900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

AMD FirePro V5900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Feb 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
614.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
153.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV530
Cayman LE WS
GPU Variant
RV530 X1650 (215CCCBKB12FG)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy