Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs Intel Arc A310

ATI FirePro V7750 vs Intel Arc A310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
Arc A310 +425%
2.688 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
DG2-128
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy