Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750 +1037%
0.512 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

76W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
G96C
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy