Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
248 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (43W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750 +172%
0.512 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Feb 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
320
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

76W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GT215
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy