Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Lower TDP (19W vs 76W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750 +412%
0.512 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
FirePro
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
320
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GF119
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy