Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V7750 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7750 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7750 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7750
0.512 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +5120%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
320
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
25.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
AD104
RV730 GL XTX
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy