Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7760 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

ATI FirePro V7760 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7760 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7760 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7760
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280 +178%
3.344 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
850 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
27.20GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

76W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Tahiti
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy