Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

ATI FirePro V7800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7800 +199%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1440
Shading Units
240
72
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
673.9 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
84.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
219W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200B
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-105-B3
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy