Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +580%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
4480
80
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GA100
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy