Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 315 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 315 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI +4024%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce 315 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1280
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
33W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GT218
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy