CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
VS
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
+1071%
21.75 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
VS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
339.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.75 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
21.75 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
339.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
GA104
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GA104-401-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
290W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
5
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon HD 6390
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
7
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
8
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700
9
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-12Q
10
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 745 OEM
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy