Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon R9 285X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285X +121%
4.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.06 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.3 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.104 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Tonga
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy