Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +1174%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
May 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
80
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
335W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy