Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI vs ATI Radeon X1700 FSC

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV535
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
TeraScale 3
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
44W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy