Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +866%
1.856 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV630
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy