Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +83%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Tahiti
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy