Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +1089%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Oct 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
G94B
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy