Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro RG220

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1200 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +2220%
1.856 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
May 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
80
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
M93
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy