Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +347%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2012
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
1280
Shading Units
144
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.28 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GF116
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF116-150-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy