Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +208%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450
0.601 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
902 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.73GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
4
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.264 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
601.3 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.11 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
106W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GF106
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF106-250-KA-A1
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy