Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +289%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jul 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
1280
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GT200B
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy