Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +198%
1.856 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
1280
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
236W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GT200
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy