Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +456%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GA100
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy