Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX

ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 2950 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.06GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2950 XTX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900 +273%
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2950 XTX
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1126 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.06GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
RV670
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV670 XTX (215-0708004)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy