CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
VS
ATI FirePro V7900
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1243MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2
+208%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
VS
Radeon Pro V7350X2
Graphics Card
May 2011
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1188 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
36
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Cayman
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
TeraScale 3
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 20 GB
2
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 OEM
3
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
4
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
5
ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT
6
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD FirePro RG220
7
ATI FirePro V7900 vs Intel Xe DG1
8
ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
9
ATI FirePro V7900 vs ATI Radeon HD 4710
10
ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy