Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +462%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Dec 2019
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 10
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy