Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +398%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Jun 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 23
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy