Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

ATI FirePro V7900 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7900 XTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 355W)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2498MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7900 XTX +3207%
61.39 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Nov 2022
FirePro
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1929 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2498 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
96
1280
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.6 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
959.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.8 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.39 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.918 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
Navi 31
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XTX (215-145000146)
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
355W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy