Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +1340%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
1280
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
AD104
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy