Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +3417%
65.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
100
1280
Shading Units
12800
80
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
AD102
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy