Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

ATI FirePro V7900 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +45%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2011
Release Date
Apr 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
58.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1.856 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
464.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cayman
GPU Name
GA107
Cayman PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.64 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
389 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy